Wait, whaaat? [Spiffy]

Jesse Marsch Slammed By Troy Deeney For 'BS' Comment After South Africa v Canada

:speaking_head_in_silhouette: 'How can you say that?! It's BS' :shrug:

*cocks back head* *takes deep breath* *laser eyes* POOOOOOOOOP [Sick]

[link] [10 comments]

Analyst astounded as GOP criticism of Trump's Iran war grows louder: 'Complete loss'

A political analyst was astounded on Sunday as Republican criticism of President Donald Trump's war with Iran grew louder following the collapse of peace talks in Switzerland. David Pakman, host of the David Pakman Show on YouTube, reacted to former Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy's recent appearance on Fox News, where he sharply criticized the alleged deal that the Trump administration struck with the Iranian regime last weekend, in a new episode on Sunday. Gowdy described Trump's deal as a capitulation, arguing that he released the economic stranglehold that the U.S. held over Iran for decades. I thought somebody was spoofing me when I saw what we're giving up, Gowdy said. Pakman noted that Gowdy isn't the only Republican who has criticized the deal the Trump administration made, which included immediately allowing Iran to sell oil again in exchange for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. It also delayed talks about Iran's nuclear program, which was something that former President Barack Obama's deal with Iran addressed up front. If Obama's deal was appeasement, what are we calling this? Pakman said. It is a major and complete loss, and even Trey Gowdy realizes it.Pakman's comments came at a time when tensions between Iran and the U.S. seemed to be ramping up again. The Iranian regime announced on Saturday that it was closing the Strait again due to ongoing fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. On Sunday, Vice President J.D. Vance was snubbed by the Iranian Foreign Minister during a press event, which some analysts described as humiliating.

US-Iran agreement amounts to 'conditional surrender', analyst says on Tucker Carlson's show

US-Iran agreement amounts to 'conditional surrender', analyst says on Tucker Carlson's show The memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed by the United States after the joint US-Israeli war on Iran amounts to a conditional surrender document, geopolitical analyst Brandon Weichert said during an appearance on political commentator Tucker Carlson's show. Weichert stated that Washington entered negotiations after depleting significant portions of its missile stockpiles. Ultimately, this is a conditional surrender document, Weichert said. The United States started a war and it promptly lost. The Iranians have, unfortunately, at a strategic level, achieved victory. The Trump administration agreed to, and they didn't have a choice, because the president already said that we're gonna run out of oil in four weeks, so he was up against a wall, he said, adding, and good for him for doing this, but ultimately this is a conditional surrender document. Weichert's remarks come amid debate over the MoU, which outlines a framework for continued negotiations between Washington and Tehran and is intended to maintain a ceasefire reached after months of military confrontation. Read more: US-Iran agreement amounts to 'conditional surrender', analyst says on Tucker Carlson's show US President Donald Trump salutes as a US Army carry team transfers the body of Officer Robert Marzan at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware on 7 March 2026 (Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images via AFP)

‘Just pieces of paper’: Labor mocked for weak rules-based response to Chinese aggression

Sky News host James Macpherson mocks the Labor government for responding to clear Chinese aggression in the region with a passive reminder about the rules of The Hague Convention. ​“I just find it amusing, in a dark kind of way, that our politicians talk as if they’re genuinely taken aback that the Chinese Communist Party isn’t abiding by the world’s best practices,” Mr Macpherson said. ​“If The Hague Convention best practice and standard procedures were actual defences, we’d be a world superpower the way our politicians expertly wield them in the face of aggression. ​“Sadly, they’re just pieces of paper. ​“When you are a major power, you are not too bothered by the world’s best practice or by standard operating procedure. ​“Sure, you pay lip service to those things when it's convenient, but when those niceties get in the way of military expansion, you leave them to people like Pat Conroy and podcasters like Anthony Albanese. ​“If you asked Xi Jinping whether he’d rather shag, marry, or date The Hague Convention, he’d say none of the above.”